Hockley said she had promised, after her son’s death, to create change that would prevent mass shootings. ![]() “This landmark, historic victory sends a forceful and compelling message to manufacturers and to the insurance and banking industries that support them: This is a high-risk market, it is not profitable, and you will be held accountable,” said Nicole Hockley, whose 6-year-old son Dylan was killed in the shooting. Relatives of the victims spoke at the news conference to remember their loved ones and celebrate the settlement. It hasn’t technically been approved yet, but she said, “there’s no expectation that approval won’t happen” and said, “this is over.” Julia Ofman, a spokesperson working with the Koskoff law firm, told CNN the settlement has been filed today in bankruptcy court. More work needs to be done to make the documents digestible to the public, he said. The public should “stay tuned” for more information about the thousands of internal Remington documents the plaintiffs obtained, Koskoff said. “Have you ever heard of an insurance company standing behind an insured that has no care whatsoever for the risk they’re creating? … Where is the oversight? This can be done.” “Insurance companies, it’s time for you to start treating the gun industry like you treat me every time I get a speeding ticket. The settlement also should be a warning to insurance companies covering gun manufacturers, Koskoff said. The US Supreme Court in 2019 decided not to take up an appeal by Remington, effectively allowing the suit to move forward. Bryan Anselm/Redux for CNNĢ6 playgrounds honor the students and the teachers killed at Sandy Hook Nicole Hockley poses for a portrait at a playground dedicated to her son Dylan, a Sandy Hook victim, in Westport, Connecticut. Lawyers for the plaintiffs contended that the company marketed rifles by extolling the militaristic qualities of the rifle and reinforcing the image of a combat weapon – in violation of a Connecticut law that prevents deceptive marketing practices. A 2005 federal law protects many gun manufacturers from wrongful death lawsuits brought by family members – but the marketing argument was a new approach. The families sued Remington in 2014, alleging it should be held partially responsible for the shooting because of its marketing strategy. “We hope they realize they have skin in the game, instead of blaming literally everybody else.”ĬNN has reached out to attorneys for Remington but has not heard back. “We established what was clearly true … the immunity protecting the gun industry is not bulletproof,” plaintiffs’ attorney Josh Koskoff said in a news conference in Trumbull, Connecticut. The families have also “obtained and can make public thousands of pages of internal company documents that prove Remington’s wrongdoing and carry important lessons for helping to prevent future mass shootings,” the plaintiffs’ attorneys said in a news release.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |